Clinical Errors and Medical Negligence
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper discusses the definition, nature and origins of clinical errors including their prevention. The relationship between clinical errors and medical negligence is examined as are the characteristics of litigants and events that are the source of litigation. The pattern of malpractice claims in different specialties and settings is examined. Among hospitalized patients worldwide, 3-16% suffer injury as a result of medical intervention, the most common being the adverse effects of drugs. The frequency of adverse drug effects appears superficially to be higher in intensive care units and emergency departments but once rates have been corrected for volume of patients, comorbidity of conditions and number of drugs prescribed, the difference is not significant. It is concluded that probably no more than 1 in 7 adverse events in medicine result in a malpractice claim and the factors that predict that a patient will resort to litigation include a prior poor relationship with the clinician and the feeling that the patient is not being kept informed. Methods for preventing clinical errors are still in their infancy. The most promising include new technologies such as electronic prescribing systems, diagnostic and clinical decision-making aids and error-resistant systems.
منابع مشابه
Negligence, genuine error, and litigation
Not all medical injuries are the result of negligence. In fact, most medical injuries are the result either of the inherent risk in the practice of medicine, or due to system errors, which cannot be prevented simply through fear of disciplinary action. This paper will discuss the differences between adverse events, negligence, and system errors; the current medical malpractice tort system in th...
متن کاملLearning from other people's mistakes.
Clinical negligence claims are a rich source of risk management material. Although medical practice varies to some extent around the globe, familiar themes can be identified from the cases reported to the Medical Protection Society’s (MPS) Claims Committee. Case reports inevitably focus on the lessons that can be learnt and so tend to be reports where the errors in management are unequivocal. H...
متن کاملNew Differences between Negligence and Strict Liability and Their Implications on Medical Malpractice Reform
This Article seeks to explore previously unexamined differences between the negligence and strict liability rules and thereby examine whether medical liability reform is required. The main thesis is that negligence as a basis for liability entails a unique mechanism, which is essentially different than the strict liability mechanism, and is more efficient for several reasons related to the lega...
متن کاملConcept Analysis of Nursing Negligence
Introduction: Negligence is the most common concept in dealing with medical errors. Regarding ambiguity and lack of information on the concept, this study was conducted to analyze the concept of negligence in nursing. Methods: In this study, Walker &Avant approach was used to analyze the concept. After searching the databases, the relevant documents entered in the study. To collect data, Persia...
متن کاملRadiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction.
pproximately 4% of radiologic interpretations rendered by radiologists in their daily practice contain errors [3]. Fortunately, most of these errors are of such minor degree, or if serious are found and corrected with sufficient promptness, that they do not cause injury to patients. Nevertheless, many radiologic errors do harm patients and, as a result, medical malpractice lawsuits are generate...
متن کامل